A Site Dedicated to all enthusiasts of Classic Style Banjo
Hi Tim,
most (if not all) of the music published in Stewart's B&G Journal was in A notation, and a lot of it is pretty good!
There is nothing like consensus on tunings vs notation at all until 1907, IFAIK. American publications generically point to eAEG#B well into the 1890's. I don't recall the issue but Stewart remarks on how intelligent we are to be reading/teaching in three sharps (but tuning gCGBD) as compared to none. Some of my sheet music has notes which give the banjoist specific instructions on tuning to play with the piano...usually to eAEG#B/eBEG#B. This, I take as an implication that the banjo was otherwise tuned gCGBD, though the notation is in A. I believe this 'transition' started to appear in the mid-to-late 1880's. Indeed, I have some American stuff published in C notation from the early 1890's...and a few pieces published in both (Brit pubs designed for export).
The Converse Analytical is indeed part of the Classic canon. AFAIC, anything played fingerstyle from the 19th cent to the early 20th is fair game. The ABF has been running a series on the early banjo tutors for the past couple of years...mostly obscure stuff (ie, not the 'big four') but much is transitional between stroke and fingerstyle.
There is absolutely no prohibition regarding tuning or reading in a particular notational scheme. The biggest issue I see is that learning to read in A notation limits you to American publications prior to 1907 (Hi Joel!), while learning to read in C notation limits you to mostly Brit publications prior to 1907 and then whatever has been published thereafter.
OTOH, if you were to say, attend an ABF rally, you would probably be playing alone in eAEG#B tuning and reading tunes out of A notation. The bulk of their rep is both C notation and gCGBD tuning. Same goes for visits to the UK.
Add a Comment
© 2024 Created by thereallyniceman. Powered by
You need to be a member of Classic-Banjo to add comments!
Join Classic-Banjo